This week, I
went to the learning community institute and the Iowa State Leadership
Experience conferences. They both provided me with a great deal of information
that I can use in my social life, in academia, and next fall in my recitation
section. At the learning community institute, one of the events I went to was
about time management and study groups and taught by Carrielle Cofax. I learned
some pretty important ideas about studying at this event. I learned that when
you study, you should take a break every 20 minutes in order to stay focused.
This seems counterintuitive because you would lose important ideas while
writing a paper or you would never get important projects done. However, I have
realized that I tend to study and do work for hours on end which may inhibit my
ability to retain information. Perhaps taking a break would allow me to improve
my studying. This information will be very helpful for my recitation next fall because
I can help students identify what kind of studying works best for them. Another
event I attended at LCI was the Nature of Science in an English Learning
Community which was taught by Jenny Aune. I found this session to be very
informative. Jenny presented information regarding her research which was about
how she incorporated the nature of science and misconceptions about science
into an English 250 class. Most of the information presented was about how
science could be biased, and that it was not perfect. In most of my classes
this semester and last semester, we are just beginning to discuss these ideas.
I feel that if I had learned this freshman year, I could have brought a whole
different perspective to each of my classes. While I don’t see us peer mentors
being able to apply these ideas to our recitations next fall, I do believe that
freshman could learn a whole lot more by having a specific class devoted to
this idea. Perhaps the university could create a class for this purpose.
At ISLE
(pronounced Izzle), I found the keynote speaker to be very interesting. During
his speech, he had us form to circles and talk with various people about
important events in our life and ask questions about those events. I feel this
is important because it is one thing to be proud about an accomplishment, but
it is another to ask why you feel proud and build on that. Another event I
attended was Positive Conflict which was taught by Michelle Boettcher and Brad
Freihoeffer. This was interesting because it brought up different conflict
management styles. I found that I have a competing conflict management style
which means that I see conflict as a win-lose situation. This is important to
know because it will influence how I handle my interactions with other peer
mentors and with my students next fall. I will have to keep myself in check to
insure that I pay attention to the styles of everyone else to avoid aggravating
the conflict. As the instructors said, conflict is going to happen, but combat
is optional. Finally, the other event I attended was the Johari Window which
was taught by Carolyn Duven. The lesson from this was that a group dynamic is
influenced by what is known by yourself and what is known by others. We want to
increase what is known by everyone while decreasing the unknown areas. This
means that it is important to ask questions otherwise groups will never be
fully cohesive.
I’m sorry for
the essay of a blog post. I learned a lot from these conferences. I hope that I
can successfully apply the knowledge I have gained to every aspect of my life.
I also went to the Johari Window session and I found it very interesting. I learned that I could afford to come out of my shell a little more when first meeting people and increase my free area pane of the window.
ReplyDeleteIt sounds like you learned a lot over those two days. Although I did not go to the Johari Window session, the last session that I attened did a quick overview of it and it sounded pretty interesting. I think being aware of your conflict resolution style will help you in the future.
ReplyDelete